Subject	not at all...you're still w/in range on 5. (n/m)
Posted by	Chris(NJ) on June 12, 2004 at 6:54 AM
	This message has been viewed 18 times.
In Reply To	Should i be concerned with these Compression #'s? posted by Red300ztt96 on June 12, 2004 at 01:08 AM
Message
Follow Ups	Should i be concerned with these Compression #'s? - Red300ztt96 01:08:38 06/12/04 those are very high numbers man (n/m) - Pure-Evil 01:11:03 06/12/04 not at all...you're still w/in range on 5. (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 06:54:53 06/12/04 still good to go (n/m) - kandy2dr 09:52:40 06/12/04 it's becoming borderline I think, but you are still good to - z rider 11:11:16 06/12/04 u have no idea what the hell u are talking about, do u? (n/m) - Red300ztt96 13:03:37 06/12/04 yeah, usually i heard that the numbers shouldn't be more - z rider 14:29:11 06/12/04 best to go with your strengths (n/m) - Guapo 16:22:27 06/12/04 10% (n/m) - Chris(NJ) 17:42:33 06/12/04 less than 10% diff btwn highest and lowest is good (n/m) - robo (sebring1970) 11:34:34 06/12/04 Any concern with cylinder 5? (n/m) - NytWolf 16:19:08 06/12/04 um, according to my math, 163 X 10% = 16.3, - robo (sebring1970) 19:04:26 06/12/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.